Please Log in / Register to access the full text of this judgment and the entire database
(2021) Law Today Live Doc. Id. 15810
Decided on: 11.01.2021
Present:
Mr. B.S. Bhalla, Advocate for the petitioner.
Ms. Samina Dhir, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab.
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (61 of 1985), Sections 21(c), 25, 29 – Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), Section 439 – NDPS case – Regular bail -- During checking of car, 150 grams of heroin was recovered from the petitioner and 270 grams from KS – State submits that 420 grams of heroin was recovered in total, which is commercial in quantity -- Conclusion of trial is likely to take time and no recovery is to be made -- As per the case made out, non-commercial quantity of heroin has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner – Petition allowed.
(Para 2-8)
***
AVNEESH JHINGAN, J. (ORAL)
1. The matter is taken up for hearing through video conference due to COVID-19 situation.
2. The petition is filed seeking regular bail in FIR No.279, dated 28th October, 2020 under Sections 21 (c), 25 and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (‘Act’), registered at Police Station City Tarn Taran, District Tarn Taran.
3. The FIR was registered as a result of checking of car bearing registration PB02-DZ-7786, on the basis of secret information. During checking, 150 grams of heroin was recovered from the petitioner-Joban Singh @ Bikka and 270 grams of heroin was recovered from one Karandeep Singh.
4. Mr. B.S. Bhalla, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that alleged recovery is of non-commercial quantity; the petitioner is in custody since 28th October, 2020; no recovery is to be made and petitioner is not involved in any other case under the Act.
5. Ms. Samina Dhir, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab submits that 420 grams of heroin was recovered in total, which is commercial in quantity. She opposes the prayer for grant of bail.
6. On weighing the facts of the case, it is not found to be a appropriate case for further denying the personal liberty of the petitioner. More so, when the conclusion of trial is likely to take time and no recovery is to be made. As per the case made out, non-commercial quantity of heroin has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner.
7. In view of above, the petitioner is granted bail on furnishing surety bonds to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate/ Duty Magistrate concerned.
8. The petition is allowed.
9. It is clarified that the observations made hereinabove shall not be construed as an expression of opinion on the merits of the case.
Petition allowed.
********