Please Log in / Register to access the full text of this judgment and the entire database
(2021) Law Today Live Doc. Id. 16441
Decided on: 01.09.2021
Present:
Mr. Randeep S. Dhull, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Aman Bahri, Addl. AG, Haryana.
Constitution of India, Articles 226, 227 – Haryana Good Conduct Prisoners (Temporary Release) Act, 1988 (28 of 1988), Section 2 (d), 3 (1) (d) – Haryana Good Conduct Prisoners (Temporary Release) Rules, 2007, Rule 8 (iii) – Parole -- As per the jail records no new case was registered against the petitioner during the period he had been released on interim bail in the past – Court deemed it appropriate to grant parole to the petitioner for 3 weeks.
(Para 1-4)
***
AJAY TEWARI, J. (ORAL) –
1. This is a criminal writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 3 Sub-Section (1) (d) and Section 2 (d) of the Haryana Good Conduct Prisoners (Temporary Release) Act, 198 and Rule 8 (iii) of the Haryana Good Conduct Prisoners (Temporary Release) Rules, 2007 for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing of speaking order dated 16.06.2021 (Annexure P-1) passed by the Commissioner, Rohtak Division, Rohtak.
2. The prayer made by the petitioner in this petition is for grant of parole for repair of the house.
3. Pursuant to order dated 26.08.2021, learned Additional Advocate General, Haryana states that he has instructions from Deputy Superintendent, District Jail, Rohtak that as per the jail records no new case was registered against the petitioner during the period he had been released on interim bail in the past.
4. In view of the details mentioned in order dated 26.08.2021 and the clarification made by learned Additional Advocate General, Haryana, we deem it appropriate to grant parole to the petitioner for 3 weeks.
5. We accordingly direct that the petitioner be released on parole for a period of 3 weeks from the date of his actual release, subject to his furnishing bonds to the satisfaction of Deputy Superintendent, District Jail, Rohtak and subject to the further condition that he will positively surrender on the expiry of his parole period.
6. The petition is disposed of in the above terms.
Petition allowed.
********