Please Log in / Register to access the full text of this judgment and the entire database

Log in / Register

Sudhir Mishra v. State of U.P. thru Prin. Secy. Appointment Deptt. Lucknow & Ors. (All. H.C.)
From the Database of www.lawtodaylive.com
Allahabad High Court
(LUCKNOW BENCH)
Reserved on: 06.02.2025 Decided on: 10.03.2025

Constitution of India, Article 14 -- Uttar Pradesh Judicial Service Rules, 2001, Rule 24(4) -- Scuffle between judicial officers -- Discharge of Probationer Judicial Officers – Rule of natural justice -- Order of discharge of services of petitioners as probationer are clearly stigmatic which required inquiry prior to discharge from service -- Since the order of discharge of service of petitioners is punitive in nature, the maxim of Audi alterm partem was required to be followed prior to their discharge.

(Para 7, 94)

www.lawtodaylive.com
Sudhir Mishra v. State of U.P. thru Prin. Secy. Appointment Deptt. Lucknow & Ors. (All. H.C.) (Lucknow) F.B.
(2025) Law Today Live Doc. Id. 19931 = 2025 :AHC-LKO: 14635
From the Database of www.lawtodaylive.com
Allahabad High Court
(LUCKNOW BENCH)
Before: Subhash Vidyarthi, Manish Mathur & Jaspreet Singh, JJ.
Writ A No. - 2001502 of 2014

Reserved on: 06.02.2025 Decided on: 10.03.2025
Sudhir Mishra - Petitioner
Versus
State of U.P. thru Prin. Secy. Appointment Deptt. Lucknow & Ors. - Respondents

Alongwith

Writ A No. - 2001775 of 2014, Asha Ram Pandey v. State Of U.P. Thru Prin. Secy. Appointment Deptt. Lko. & Ors.,

Writ A No. - 2001776 of 2014, Akhilesh Kumar Sharma v. State Of U.P. Through Prin. Secy. Appointment Deptt. Lko. &,

Writ A No. - 2001811 of 2014, Ashtosh Tripathi v. State Of U.P. Through Prin. Secy. Appointment Deptt. Lko. &,

Writ A No. - 2001356 of 2015, Mukesh Kumar & Anr. v. State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Appointment, Lucknow & 2 Ors.

And

Writ A No. - 2001357 of 2015, Hirdesh Kumar & Anr. v. State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Appointment, Lucknow & 2 Ors.

Constitution of India, Article 14 -- Uttar Pradesh Judicial Service Rules, 2001, Rule 24(4) -- Scuffle between judicial officers -- Discharge of Probationer Judicial Officers – Rule of natural justice -- Order of discharge of services of petitioners as probationer are clearly stigmatic which required inquiry prior to discharge from service -- Since the order of discharge of service of petitioners is punitive in nature, the maxim of Audi alterm partem was required to be followed prior to their discharge.

(Para 7, 94)

www.lawtodaylive.com