Please Log in / Register to access the full text of this judgment and the entire database
(2022) Law Today Live Doc. Id. 17096 = 2022(2) 342
Decided on: 06.09.2022
Present:
Mr. Sarvpreet Singh Gurna, Advocate for the petitioner(s).
Mr. Vikas Mehsempuri, Advocate for the respondent No.1 to 3.
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (V of 1908), Order 26 Rule 9 -- Appointment of Local Commissioner – Application declined – Maintainability of revision -- Order dismissing an application for nominating a Local Commissioner to demarcate the area is not amenable to interference in the revisional jurisdiction.
(Para 1)
Cases referred:
1. Harvinder Kaur and another vs. Godha Ram and another, 1979 PLJ 562.
2. Pritam Singh and another vs. Sunder Lal and others, 1990(2) PLR 191.
***
ANIL KSHETARPAL, J. –
1. In view of the two different Division Bench judgments passed in Harvinder Kaur and another vs. Godha Ram and another 1979 PLJ 562 and Pritam Singh and another vs. Sunder Lal and others, 1990(2) PLR 191, the order dismissing an application for nominating a Local Commissioner to demarcate the area is not amenable to interference in the revisional jurisdiction.
2. In view of the above, the present revision petition is dismissed. The miscellaneous application(s) pending, if any, shall stand disposed of.
Petition dismissed.
********