Please Log in / Register to access the full text of this judgment and the entire database
(2024) Law Today Live Doc. Id. 19214
Reserved on: 03.04.2024 Decided on: 06.05.2024
Alongwith
CRM-M-55249-2022
(Sunil Kumari and others v. State of Haryana and another)
Indian Penal Code, 1860 (45 of 1860), Section 403, 420, 421, 425 -- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), Section 482 – Quashing of FIR – Commercial transaction – Breach of contract -- Three hypothecated trucks not produced for inspection -- Rather disclosed that they had dismantled and disposed of the same -- Said act prima facie, makes out a case u/s 421 and 425 of IPC -- At the stage of considering the quashing of the FIR, the Court is required only to look into the allegations made in the complaint/ FIR by taking them to be at their face value -- Mere fact that the complaint relates to a commercial transaction or breach of contract, for which a civil remedy is available or has been availed, is not by itself a ground to quash the criminal proceedings -- Both criminal and civil law remedy can be pursued – Quashing petition dismissed.
(Para 34-38)
***
Full text Judgment/ Order with Headnote
Note:
For easy reference of readers, alongwith Headnote, the judgment downloaded from the official website of the Court has been annexed