Please Log in / Register to access the full text of this judgment and the entire database
(2023) Law Today Live Doc. Id. 18209
Decided on: 12.06.2023
For the petitioner:
Mr. Nitin Thakur, Advocate.
For the respondent:
Mr. Mohinder Zharaick, Additional Advocate General.
Himachal Pradesh Excise Act, 2011 (33 of 2012), Section 39(1)(a) (c), 47, 50 -- Indian Penal Code, 1860 (45 of 1860), Section 420, 467, 468, 471, 304, 120-B -- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), Section 439 – Regular bail – Conspiracy to manufacture and sale of spurious liquor – Petitioner is alleged to have supplied caps for bottling of spurious liquor -- Petitioner is in custody since 19.04.2023 -- Pre-trial incarceration is not the rule -- Many of the co-accused have already been released on bail – Investigation complete, Challan presented in Court -- No fruitful purpose would be served by prolonging custody of accused till conclusion of trial, which is likely to take some time -- Bail allowed.
(Para 7-11)
***
SATYEN VAIDYA, J. (ORAL) –
Petitioner is an accused in case FIR No. 25/2022, dated 22.01.2022, registered under Sections 39(1)(a) (c), 47 & 50 of Himachal Pradesh Excise Act and Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 304 and 120-B of Indian Penal Code, at Police Station Nalagarh, District Solan, H.P.
2. Brief facts are that on 21.01.2022, police officials of Police Post Joghoo under Police Station Nalagarh, District Solan, H.P. conducted a raid at place Nal (Gujjarhatti) forest and seized a number of articles evidently used in manufacture/illicit bottling etc. of liquor. Initially, the case was registered under Sections 39(1)(c), 47 & 50 of Himachal Pradesh Excise Act. During investigation, implication of various persons in manufacture of spurious liquor, its bottling and sale etc. was found. Such persons were arrested. It was also found that various acts of fraud, forgery etc. had also been committed in pursuance to criminal conspiracy between various persons. An employee of one of the persons arrayed as an accused was found to have died by consuming the spurious liquor. Accordingly, Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 304 and 120-B of IPC were added.
3. The allegation against the petitioner is that he had conspired with other co-accused in manufacture and sale of spurious liquor. It is alleged that petitioner had supplied thousands of caps for bottling of spurious liquor.
4. Petitioner has sought his bail on the grounds that he is innocent and has been falsely implicated. He has nothing to do with the crime. Petitioner is a permanent resident of Village and P.O. Hatli Sulatani, Tehsil Bangana, District Una, H.P. and there is no likelihood of his absconding from the course of justice. He will face the trial and will abide by all the conditions as may be imposed. He will not jump the bail and will also not tamper with the prosecution evidence, in any manner, whatsoever.
5. Application has been opposed, on the ground that petitioner is an accused in another cases of similar nature.
6. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Advocate General and have also gone through the status report.
7. Record reveals that investigation in the case has already been completed and challan has been filed in the Court of competent jurisdiction. The allegation against the petitioner is that he had conspired with other co-accused in manufacture and sale of spurious liquor. Petitioner is alleged to have supplied caps for bottling of spurious liquor.
8. Petitioner is in custody since 19.04.2023. The allegations against the petitioner are yet to be proved. Pre-trial incarceration is not the rule. Many of the co-accused in the case FIR No. 25/2022, dated 22.01.2022, have already been released on bail by this Court.
9. Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case, no fruitful purpose shall be served by prolonging the custody of the petitioner in the instant case till conclusion of trial, which is likely to take sometime before conclusion. Nothing is stated to be recovered from the petitioner in the instant case.
10. Petitioner is a permanent resident of Village and Post Office Hatli Sulatani, Tehsil Bangana, District Una, H.P. and there is no apprehension of his absconding or fleeing from the course of justice. Even otherwise, he can be put to appropriate terms in order to secure his presence for the purposes of trial. It is not the case of the respondent that in case of grant of bail to the petitioner, the trial of the case shall be affected adversely. It is also not alleged against the petitioner that he has potential to tamper with the prosecution evidence.
11. In the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, the petition is allowed and petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in case FIR No. 25/2022, dated 22.01.2022, under Sections 39(1)(a) (c), 47 & 50 of H.P. Excise Act and Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 304 and 120-B of IPC, registered at Police Station Nalagarh, District Solan, H.P., on his furnishing personal bond in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of learned trial court. This order shall, however, be subject to the following conditions:-
i) Petitioner shall regularly attend the trial of the case before learned Trial Court and shall not cause any delay in its conclusion.
ii) Petitioner shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence, in any manner, whatsoever and shall not dissuade any person from speaking the truth in relation to the facts of the case in hand.
iii) Petitioner shall be liable for immediate arrest in the instant case in the event of petitioner violating the conditions of this bail.
(iv) Petitioner shall not leave India without permission of learned trial Court till completion of trial.
12. Any expression of opinion herein-above shall have no bearing on the merits of the case and shall be deemed only for the purpose of disposal of this petition.
Petition allowed.
********