Please Log in / Register to access the full text of this judgment and the entire database
(2022) Law Today Live Doc. Id. 16913 = 2022(1) L.A.R. 651
Decided on: 02.06.2022
Present:
Mr. Mandeep Kumar Dhot, Advocate for the petitioner(s).
East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 (III of 1949), Section 13, 15 – Eviction of tenant -- Provisional rent assessed -- Petitioner, despite having been granted an opportunity, has failed to make the payment -- Consequently, his eviction was ordered -- Appeal filed by the petitioner dismissed – Petitioner has not paid any penny, till date -- No ground to interfere, revision dismissed.
(Para 1-3)
Cases referred:
1. Rakesh Wadhawan & Others v. M/s Jagdamba Industrial Corporation & Others (2002) 5 SCC 440.
***
ANIL KSHETARPAL, J.—
1. The petitioner herein is a tenant. As per the provisions of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, the Rent Controller has assessed the provisional rent. The provisional rent is assessed on the basis of the interpretation given by the Supreme Court in Rakesh Wadhawan & Others v. M/s Jagdamba Industrial Corporation & Others (2002) 5 SCC 440.
2. The petitioner, despite having been granted an opportunity, has failed to make the payment. Consequently, his eviction was ordered. The appeal filed by the petitioner has also been dismissed.
3. The petitioner has not paid any penny, till date. Hence, no ground is made out to interfere. Consequently, the present revision petition is dismissed.
Petition dismissed.
********