Please Log in / Register to access the full text of this judgment and the entire database
(2023) Law Today Live Doc. Id. 17859
Decided on: 17.04.2023
Present:
Mr. Vikram Jeet Singh, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Ankur Bali, APP for U.T., Chandigarh for respondents No. 1 to 3.
Mr. Sahil Goel, Advocate for respondent No. 4.
Constitution of India, Article 226 – Life and liberty -- Police protection -- Senior Superintendent of Police directed to depute a senior officer to look into the matter and after seeking a report, he may pass an appropriate orders, in accordance with law.
(Para 1-6)
***
N.S.SHEKHAWAT, J. (ORAL) –
1. The petitioners have filed the instant petition with a prayer to direct the respondents No.2 and 3 to protect the lives and liberty of the petitioners and also direct the respondents No.4 and 5 not to interfere in their lives and liberty.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have already submitted a representation dated 04.04.2023 (Annexure P-4) to the Senior Superintendent of Police, Chandigarh and he shall be satisfied if directions are issued to respondent No.2 to look into their aforesaid representation.
3. Notice of motion to respondents No.1 to 3 only.
4. On the asking of the Court, Mr. Ankur Bali, APP for U.T., Chandigarh accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3.
5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties.
6. In view of the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners and without expressing anything on the merits and claim of the parties, respondent No.2-the Senior Superintendent of Police, Chandigarh, is directed to depute a senior officer to look into the matter and after seeking a report, he may pass an appropriate orders, in accordance with law.
7. The parties mentioned in the petition or any other person mentioned in the petition shall be at liberty to take recourse to appropriate law, if any.
8. With these observations, this petition is disposed of.
Order accordingly.
********