Please Log in / Register to access the full text of this judgment and the entire database
(2021) Law Today Live Doc. Id. 16301
Decided on: 01.07.2021
Present:
Mr. Jai Vir Yadav, Senior Advocate with Mr. Nitish Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Surender Singh, AAG, Haryana.
Mr. R.S. Mamli, Advocate for the complainant.
Indian Penal Code, 1860 (45 of 1860), Sections 147, 149, 323, 302, 506, 188, 216 – Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), Section 439 -- Murder case – Regular bail -- Petitioner is not named in the FIR, no injury is attributed to him, he is in custody for almost 9 months, he is 19 year of age and is not involved in any other case, the COVID-19 pandemic and the conclusion of the trial is likely to take some time, Court deemed it a fit case to grant the concession of regular bail to the petitioner.
(Para 7)
***
ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL, J. (ORAL) –
1. Heard through video conferencing.
2. The petitioner is seeking regular bail in FIR No.150 dated 14.04.2020, under Sections 147, 149, 323, 302, 506, 188, 216 IPC, registered at Police Station Khol, District Rewari.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner is not named in the FIR wherein 8 persons have been specifically named. He was arraigned as an accused on the supplementary statement of complainant recorded on the basis of videography of the incident after one month and ten days wherein it is stated that the petitioner was also present at the place of occurrence. He further contends that no injury has been attributed to him. The deceased Bholu Ram had suffered two injuries on his head which are lacerated wounds and abrasions on his hand which are attributed to the co-accused Sube Singh who was allegedly armed with an iron rod. Three other persons had received two simple injuries each. The alleged incident is stated to have taken place when the complainant party which had purchased the land from the co-sharers had tried to take possession of the same. The land had not been partitioned. The petitioner is 19 year of age. He is in custody for a period of 8 months and 27 days and is not involved in any other case. He also contends that the co-accused Anita had been granted regular bail by this Court in CRMM-28684-2020 on 19.11.2020.
4. Learned State counsel, upon instructions from ASI Dinesh, contends that challan has been filed but charges are yet to be framed. He, however, contends that in view of the serious allegations against the petitioner, the petitioner is not entitled to the concession of regular bail.
5. Learned counsel for the complainant has also contended that in view of the serious allegations against the petitioner having participated in the commission of the crime with the other accused, he is not entitled to the concession of regular bail.
6. Heard.
7. In view of the above, especially when the petitioner is not named in the FIR, no injury is attributed to him, he is in custody for almost 9 months, he is 19 year of age and is not involved in any other case, the COVID-19 pandemic and the conclusion of the trial is likely to take some time, I deem it a fit case to grant the concession of regular bail to the petitioner.
8. Therefore, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the instant petition is allowed. The petitioner is ordered to be released on regular bail on his furnishing requisite bonds to the satisfaction of the trial Court/Duty Magistrate concerned.
Petition allowed.
********