Please Log in / Register to access the full text of this judgment and the entire database
(2024) Law Today Live Doc. Id. 19302 = 2024 :PHHC: 80090
Decided on: 14.06.2024
Present:
Mr. Vishavjeet Singh Rishi, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Akshay Kumar, AAG, Punjab.
Mr. Devesh Sharma, Advocate for the respondent No. 2.
Indian Penal Code, 1860 (45 of 1860), Section 379-B, 411 – Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), Section 482 – Snatching case – Compromise quashing of FIR -- Offences, for which the petitioner/accused has been charged, are not of grave in nature – FIR and all the subsequent proceedings arising therefrom quashed.
(Para 1-7)
Cases referred:
1. Abhishek Singh & others V/s State of Punjab & others, CRM-M-25669-2020 (O&M) pronounced on: 07.04.2022.
***
KULDEEP TIWARI, J. (ORAL) –
1. The instant petition, as cast under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C., proffers the hereinafter extracted relief, as craved by the petitioner, inasmuch as, quashing of the FIR No. 77 dated 29.07.2023, under Section 379-B of the IPC (later on added Section 411 of the IPC) registered at P.S.Division No. 1, District Ludhiana and all the subsequent proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of a compromise dated 25.09.2023 (Annexure P-2), as entered into inter se the petitioner and respondent No.2 /complainant.
2. Upon an affirmative response from the learned counsel for respondent No.2/complainants qua the compromise dated 25.09.2023 (Annexure P-2), a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court had, through an order drawn on 21.5.2024, upon the instant petition, besides issuing notice, directed the parties to appear before the learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate concerned, for getting their respective statements recorded qua authenticity of the compromise dated 25.09.2023 (Annexure P-2). Moreover, the trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate concerned was also directed to send a report in the above regard.
3. Consequent to the making of the directions (supra), the parties appeared before the learned Sessions Judge, Ludhiana and got their respective statements recorded, thereby authenticating the compromise dated 25.09.2023 (Annexure P-2). Accordingly, in compliance of the directions (supra) of this Court, a Report bearing No.960 dated 31.5.2024 has been received from the learned Sessions Judge, Ludhiana, wherein, a satisfaction has been recorded by the Magistrate concerned qua the compromise (supra) being drawn in a genuine and voluntary and without any pressure or coercion and out of free will of the parties.
4. This Court have heard counsel for the parties and gone through the case file.
5. A Co-ordinate Bench of this Court, in CRM-M-25669-2020 (O&M), titled “Abhishek Singh & others V/s State of Punjab & others”, Pronounced on: 07.04.2022, while granting a similar relief, as craved in the instant petition, has observed as under:-
“9. The following aspects would be relevant to conclude this petition:-
a) The accused and the private respondents have amicably settled the matter between them in terms of the compromise deed and the statements recorded before the concerned Court;
b) A perusal of the documents reveal that the settlement has not been secured through coercion, threats, social boycotts, bribes, or other dubious means;
c) The victim has willingly consented to the nullification of criminal proceedings;
d) There is no objection from the private respondents in case present FIR and consequent proceedings are quashed;
e) In the given facts, the occurrence does not affect public peace or tranquillity, moral turpitude or harm the social and moral fabric of the society or involve matters concerning public policy;
f) The rejection of compromise may also lead to ill will. The pendency of trial affects career and happiness;
g) There is nothing on the record to prima facie consider the accused as an unscrupulous, incorrigible, or professional offender;
h) The purpose of criminal jurisprudence is reformatory in nature and to work to bring peace to family, community, and society;
i) The exercise of the inherent power for quashing the conviction, sentence and all previous proceedings is justified to secure the ends of justice.”
6. In the light of the hereinabove recorded aspects and considering the fact that the offences, for which the petitioner/accused has been charged, are not of grave in nature, as also in view of the law laid down in Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab and another, 2012 (4) RCR (Criminal) 543 = (2012) Law Today Live Doc. Id. 12249 and Kulwinder Singh, others Vs. State of Punjab 2007(3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 = (2007) Law Today Live Doc. Id. 15176, the present petition for quashing the FIR (supra) is hereby allowed.
7. Resultantly, FIR No. 77 dated 29.07.2023, under Section 379-B of the IPC (later on added Section 411 of the IPC) registered at P.S.Division No. 1, District Ludhiana and all the subsequent proceedings arising therefrom, are, hereby, quashed on the basis of a compromise dated 25.09.2023 (Annexure P-2), subject to payment of Rs.5,000/- to be deposited with the District Legal Services Authority concerned.
Petition allowed.
********