Please Log in / Register to access the full text of this judgment and the entire database
(2020) Law Today Live Doc. Id. 15588 = 2020 L.A.R. (e-Suppl.) 1832
Decided on: 05.11.2020
Present:
Mr. Rajesh Lamba, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Karan Sharma, AAG, Haryana.
Ms. Reena, Advocate, for the complainant.
(Proceedings conducted through video conferencing)
Indian Penal Code, 1860 (45 of 1860), Sections 148, 149, 323, 379-A, 506 IPC -- Arms Act, 1959 (54 of 1959), Section 25 -- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), Section 439 – Gold snatching case -- Regular bail on compromise -- Matter is stated to have been amicably resolved amongst the parties who are otherwise stated to be closely related -- Petition accepted, petitioner ordered to be released on bail.
(Para 2, 6)
***
GURVINDER SINGH GILL, J. (ORAL) –
1. The petitioner seeks grant of regular bail in respect of a case registered against him vide FIR No.319, dated 8.7.2020, Police Station Nuh, District Nuh, under Sections 148, 149, 323, 379-A, 506 IPC and Section 25 of Arms Act.
2. The FIR in question was lodged at the instance of Mubeen Ahmed wherein it is alleged that on 6.7.2020 when the complainant was proceeding from his village Khedla to Jogipur along with his wife on a motorcycle, then they were waylaid by 6 persons who had come on motorcycles and that while one of them pointed a pistol towards the complainant, the other snatched a ‘gold hansli’ weighing about 20 grams worn by complainant’s wife and also snatched an amount of Rs.2800/- from the pocket of the complainant.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the FIR came to be lodged under some misunderstanding which has now been resolved and that the complainant has no objection for grant of bail.
4. Opposing the petition, the learned State counsel has submitted that since the petitioner is specifically named in the FIR and there are serious allegations against the accused, no case for grant of bail is made out.
5. Ms. Reena, Advocate, has today put in appearance on behalf of the complainant and has endorsed the fact that the petitioner has indeed compromised the mater with the complainant and that the complainant does not have any objection for release of the petitioner on bail.
6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case especially that the matter is stated to have been amicably resolved amongst the parties who are otherwise stated to be closely related, the petition is accepted and the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail subject to his furnishing bail bonds to the satisfaction of learned trial Court/Chief Judicial Magistrate/Duty Magistrate concerned.
Petition allowed.
********