Regular bail – Parity with co-accused -- Co-accused suffered disclosure statement, wherein he named the petitioner -- Custody since 20.09.2020, challan already stand presented -- Co-accused, who nominated the petitioner have already been granted concession of regular bail alongwith one more co-accused – Purely on the parity with co-accused, petition allowed and the petitioner ordered to be released on regular bail.

(P&H HC) Decided on: 10.06.2022

Disclosure statement -- Regular bail -- Petitioner is not named in the FIR and he was later on, nominated in the case on the basis of the disclosure statement of the co-accused – Petitioner has undergone the custody of 04 months and 15 days -- Considering the fact that challan stands presented; the petitioner is not involved in any other case; the custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not required and the conclusion of the trial will take some time due to COVID-19 situation, petition allowed.

(P&H HC) Decided on: 23.11.2020

Disclosure statement -- Regular bail – Petitioner in custody since 14.05.2019 -- Petitioner was not named in the FIR and was implicated on the basis of disclosure statements of co-accused -- Petitioner is involved in one more case of similar nature -- Trial is likely to take long time due to restrictions imposed to prevent the spread of infection of Covid-19 -- Court extended the concession of regular bail to the petitioner.

(P&H HC) Decided on: 05.11.2020

Disclosure statement -- Regular bail -- No other evidence against the petitioner as on date except the statement of the co-accused which cannot be read against him -- Similarly situated co-accused has been granted bail – Petition allowed, petitioner be released on bail.

(P&H HC) Decided on: 10.08.2020

Compromise between the parties – Regular bail – Seeing the nature of accusation against the petitioners and also the fact that trial is likely to take long time due to restrictions imposed to prevent spread of Covid-19 concession of regular bail extended to the petitioners.

(P&H HC) Decided on: 29.07.2020

Affidavit of non-involvement -- Anticipatory bail -- Petitioner was granted interim bail and joined the Investigation -- Complainant had also filed an affidavit that the petitioner was not involved – Petition allowed – Interim bail order made absolute.

(SC) Decided on: 28.01.2019