A. Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (61 of 1985), Section 20, 37 – Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), Section 439 -- NDPS case – Regular bail -- Recovery of 15 kgs. 500 grams Ganja from petitioner and 16 kg. 200 grams from co-accused – Whether commercial quantity – Bail has been declined to the petitioner by treating both the recoveries together to hold the same to be commercial in nature -- Perusal of the FSL report would show that presence of Tetrahydrocannabinol, Cannabinol and Cannabidiol were found to be positive in the samples, no percentage was shown -- Keeping in view the physical appearance of the sample, it would be debatable as to the contents of ganja -- Moreover, individual recovery has to be treated which falls under non-commercial quantity -- Petitioner is in custody since 28.09.2019 -- Court deemed it appropriate to consider the prayer for grant of regular bail – Petition allowed, petitioner ordered to be released on bail.

(Para 2, 8-15)

B. Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (61 of 1985), Section 2(iii) -- Charas/ Hashish – Definition of -- Charas which is popularly known as Hashish is a separated resin obtained from Cannabis plant (Hemp) either from natural discharge of resin through its pores or by means of incisions by human intervention -- Therefore, Charas is not a Cannabis plant, but it is resin obtained from it, whereas Ganja is the flowering or fruiting tops of the Cannabis plant excluding the seeds and leaves.

(Para 12)

Indian Penal Code, 1860 (45 of 1860), Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 406, 506 – Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), Section 167(2) -- Default bail – Bail granted by JMIC u/s 167 (2) Cr.P.C. on 22.6.2021 on account of failure of the investigating agency to file challan within the prescribed period -- Requisite bonds were not furnished on behalf of the petitioner-accused on that very day, rather, on 25.06.2021, when an application was filed on behalf of petitioner/accused for furnishing of requisite bail bonds, the application was dismissed for the reason that the investigating agency had filed the challan on 22.06.2021, after passing of the order -- Impugned order cannot be sustained – Petition allowed.

(Para 2-7)

Indian Penal Code, 1860 (45 of 1860), Sections 147, 148, 149 & 302 IPC (Section 120-B of IPC added later on) -- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), Section 167(2), 439 -- Murder case -- Challan without FSL – Default bail – Right of -- FSL is a material piece of evidence to establish the case of the prosecution, but in every case, it cannot be said that in the absence of the report of FSL, the challan has to be treated as 'incomplete' – In a murder case, while the report of FSL in respect of examination of clothes of the deceased as regards presence of blood stains or viscera report would furnish a material piece of evidence, but the case of the prosecution cannot be said to be absolutely demolished in the absence of such evidence – In such like cases, the absence of FSL report cannot be interpreted to mean that an 'incomplete' challan has been filed so as to extend the benefit of default bail to the accused -- Petition dismissed – The order would not affect the right/s of the petitioner seeking grant of regular bail in terms of Section 439 Cr.P.C.

(Para 7, 8)

Indian Penal Code, 1860 (45 of 1860), Section 186, 332, 353 – Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), Section 438 -- Beating to police – Anticipatory bail -- Allegations are of tearing uniform of the petitioner who is a Police Officer and has also given the injuries to him – Contention that occurrence has not taken place in the manner as suggested by the prosecution rather petitioner was given beatings by complainant -- As per MLR of the petitioner 4 injuries were found on his person with blunt weapon -- Occurrence has been captured in the CCTV cameras, which shows that the complainant along with his two sons inflicted injuries to the petitioner – Offences u/s 353, 332 IPC are necessarily to be treated alike along with non-cognizable offence u/s 186 IPC and offence u/s 353 IPC is an aggravated form of offence under Section 186 IPC which is non-cognizable in nature – On above contentions interim bail was granted -- Petitioner has joined the investigation and no more required for further investigation of the case – Interim order made absolute.

(Para 3-6)

Indian Penal Code, 1860 (45 of 1860), Section 323, 498-A, 304B – Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, (28 of 1961), Section 3, 4 -- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), Section 438 – Anticipatory bail -- Dowry death case -- Father-in-law and mother-in-law – Earlier anticipatory bail was granted with the observation that, after charge sheet is filed, it is open for the petitioners to surrender and apply for the Regular Bail before the Competent Court – Held, same does not preclude the petitioners to apply for anticipatory bail u/s 438 Cr.P.C. after filing of the charge sheet -- It also cannot be said, that same is a second application for grant of anticipatory bail -- Husband of the deceased was granted Regular Bail after he was arrested – Held, it is a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail.

(Para 2-5)

Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (33 of 1989), Section 3 -- Indian Penal Code, 1860 (45 of 1860), Sections 148, 149, 323, 324, 506 – Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), Section 438 – Anticipatory bail -- There is nothing to suggest that the assailants had uttered any objectionable utterances or had caused injuries solely on account of the fact that the complainant belongs to a particular community – Petition accepted and the interim directions made absolute subject to the condition that the petitioner shall join investigation as and when called upon to do so and cooperate with the Investigating Officer and shall also abide by the conditions as provided under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C.

(Para 6, 7)

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), Section 173, 438 -- Anticipatory bail – Arrest of accused – Requirement of -- Power of Court – Investigaiton complete, report u/s 173 Cr.P.C. submitted to the trial court –  Once an investigating agency itself says that it does not require the custodial interrogation of an accused, normally High court would not direct his arrest (even upon a petition seeking anticipatory bail being dismissed).

(Para 2, 4)

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (61 of 1985), Section 22, 37 – Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), Section 439 – NDPS case – Commercial quantity -- Regular bail -- Recovered of 55 intoxicant injections containing Buprenorhpine 2 ml each and 55 injections containing Avil 10 ml each from polythene bag allegedly thrown on the road side -- Case involves debatable question as to whether the petitioner can be said to be in conscious possession of the contraband recovered from the polythene bag lying on the road side -- Petitioner is not involved in any other case under the NDPS Act -- Rigors of Section 37(1)(b) of the NDPS Act stand satisfied by due implication -- Further, the petitioner is in custody since 04.03.2019 -- Prosecution evidence is yet to be recorded -- Trial is likely to take long time due to restrictions imposed to prevent spread of Covid-19 -- Petitioner deserves the concession of regular bail.

(Para 14, 15)

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (61 of 1985), Sections 21, 25 (Sections 27/29 added later) – Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), Section 439 -- NDPS case – Regular bail – Involvement in 4 more FIRs but on bail -- Petitioner could not repelled by the prosecution regarding the discrepancies in the documents prepared at the spot; the affidavit of independent witness and the Certificate given by the Panchayat; the manner in which the investigation is conducted by the Deputy Superintendent of Police, who has only verified one document and has not signed any other documents; all the memos are typed documents and in some documents, FIR number is blank and filled by Pen and in some documents, it is typed by mentioning the FIR number; the discrepancies in the order of the Illaqa Magistrate and the FSL report -- Pendency of other cases cannot be taken as a bar -- Petitioner is in custody for the last 01 year, 05 months; till date even charges have not been framed and therefore, no PW has been examined; the custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not required and the conclusion of the trial will take some time due to COVID-19 situation -- Petition allowed.

(Para 17)

Indian Penal Code, 1860 (45 of 1860), Sections 498-A, 406, 354-A (Section 377 added later on) – Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), Section 438 – Dowry case – Anticipatory bail – Non-recovery of dowry articles – Effect of – Stated that petitioner has joined the investigation, however, recovery of gold ornaments and a motorcycle, which were given and entrusted to the petitioner and his family at the time of marriage has not been effected – Held, entrustment of gold ornaments as alleged are disputed questions of fact and would be considered at the time of trial -- Petition is allowed and interim order made absolute.

(Para 1-6)

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (61 of 1985), Sections 15, 18, 27A, 29, 53, 67 -- Indian Penal Code, 1860 (45 of 1860), Sections 140, 188, 216, 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 474 -- Official Secrets Act, 1923 (19 of 1923), Section 6 -- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), Section 438 -- Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (1 of 1872), Section 25 – NDPS case – Anticipatory bail – Involvement on disclosure statement – Recovery of 248 kgs of poppy husk, 1 Kg 500 grams of opium and 199 Kgs khas khas from co-accused -- FIR was registered on the basis of secret information, but still name of petitioner did not figure in the ruqa of the police – Petitioner involved on the basis of disclosure statement of co-accused is hit by the ratio of Tofan Singh’s case, Criminal Appeal No.152 of 2013 wherein it has been observed that the officers who are invested with powers u/s 53 of NDPS Act are the police officers within the meaning of Section 25 of the Evidence Act -- Any confessional statement made before the police officer would be hit by Section 25 of the Evidence Act -- Statement u/s 67 of NDPS Act cannot be used as a confessional statement in the trial of an offence under NDPS Act – Interim order confirmed.

(Para 6-12)

Indian Penal Code, 1860 (45 of 1860), Section 379, 411 – Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), Section 438 -- Theft case – Anticipatory bail -- Present FIR at Hisar -- Interim bail was granted on the contention that petitioner is being indicted for theft of vehicle in respect of that a case FIR No.434 dated 30.08.2019 u/s 379 IPC already stands registered at Gurugram and vehicle was recovered on 05.11.2019 and two accused were arrested and he was indicted on the basis of disclosure statement of one of them -- Petitioner has joined the investigation, not required for custodial interrogation for the time being -- Petition allowed.

(Para 1-5)

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (61 of 1985), Section 8, 18, 29, 37, 60 – Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), Section 439 -- NDPS case – Recovery of 5.83 kg of opium -- Regular bail -- Respondent-State could not dispute that the petitioner is not involved in any other case and he is the first offender -- Petitioner was not named in the secret information -- Petitioner was not present at the spot, when the co-accused were arrested and the recovery of narcotics was effected; the name of the petitioner surfaced, for the first time, in the disclosure statement of the co-accused – It will be a matter of trial, whether the said disclosure statement is admissible against the petitioner or not in view of “Tofan Singh vs State of Tamil Nadu”, 2013(4) RCR (Criminal) 631 -- Till date, no PW has been examined and the custody of the petitioner is approximately more than 01 year and it will take some time in conclusion of the trial due to COVID-19 situation -- Petition allowed and the petitioner is directed to be released on bail.

(Para 10-12)

Indian Penal Code, 1860 (45 of 1860), Sections 420, 465, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B -- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), Section 438 – Attesting witness of forged GPA – Anticipatory bail -- Interim bail was granted on contention that petitioner, who is a Numberdar, is an attesting witness to the General Power of Attorney, which is alleged to have been forged – Beneficiary to the GPA/ co-accused granted interim protection – Now interim bail granted to co-accused, has been made absolute by High Court – Petitioner has joined investigation and is no longer required for custodial interrogation – No other case is pending against the petitioner – Petition allowed and the order granting interim bail to the petitioner is made absolute.

(Para 2-5)

Indian Penal Code, 1860 (45 of 1860), Sections 419, 420, 465, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B – Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), Section 438 -- Cheating and forgery -- Anticipatory bail -- Dispute between the daughter-in-law and the in-laws -- Allegations are with regard to a registered Will -- Validity of Will and the dispute with regard to partition of property is before the Civil Court -- As per FIR, the case set up is on the basis of documentary evidence -- Considering that no recovery is to be made from the petitioners, it is not a case where custodial interrogation is required -- Petitioners granted anticipatory bail.

(Para 7)

Punjab Excise Act, 1914 (Punjab Act 1 of 1914), Section 61 -- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), Section 438 – Excise matter -- Anticipatory bail – Interim bail granted on submission that FIR was registered on the basis of secret information, police did not comply with the mandatory requirement of Section 100(4) Cr.P.C., 30 bottles of illicit liquor recovered from the house of the petitioner and anticipatory bail declined on the ground that he is also involved in earlier FIR u/s 61-1-14 of the Excise Act in which 280 kgs. lahan was recovered -- Petitioner has joined the investigation to the entire satisfaction of the Investigating Officer -- Petitioner is no more required for further investigation in the case -- Interim order made absolute.

(Para 3-7)

Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques (Regulation and Prevention of Misuse) Act, 1994 (Act No. 57 of 1994), Sections 23, 25, 4, 5(2) – Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 (102 of 1956), Section 15(2)(B) -- Indian Penal Code, 1860 (45 of 1860), Section 420 (Challan u/s 4(4), 5(2), 23, 25 of PC&PNDT Act, 1994, Section 15(2)(3) of the IMC Act, 1956 and Section 419, 420, 120-B of IPC) – Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), Section 438 -- Pre-natal Sex determination case – Anticipatory bail – Interim protection granted on the contention that FIR is silent with regard to the role of the petitioner and he was nominated in the second disclosure statement of co-accused -- Petitioner allegedly brought the sex determination machine -- Co-accused has already been granted regular bail by the Additional Sessions Judge by observing that it is not the case of prosecution that he had used any such techniques in detection of gender of fetus, rather according to prosecution, the determination machine used by him was a simple monitor of computer and simply cheated the decoy patient by using an ordinary monitor – Petitioner has joined the investigation to the entire satisfaction of the Investigating Officer and no more required for further investigation of the case -- Interim order made absolute.

(Para 2-6)

Punjab Excise Act, 1914 (Punjab Act 1 of 1914), Section 61 – Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), Section 100(4), 438 -- Excise matter – Anticipatory bail – On the contention that FIR was registered on the basis of secret information, but the police has not complied with mandatory requirement of Section 100(4) Cr.P.C, ad interim bail was given -- Petitioner joined the investigation to the entire satisfaction of the Investigating Officer -- Petitioner is no more required for further investigation in the case -- Interim order made absolute.

(Para 3-6)

Indian Penal Code, 1860 (45 of 1860), Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471, 506, 120-B – Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), Section 438 -- Cheating and forgery – Anticipatory bail – Compromise between parties -- Contends that the FIR is the outcome of a monetary dispute between the petitioner and respondent No.2 (complainant) which has been resolved, who contends that the matter has indeed been compromised – In view of the submissions Court deemed it a fit case to grant the concession of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

(Para 2-8)

Indian Penal Code, 1860 (45 of 1860), Section 379-B, (Sections 393 and 411 IPC added later on) – Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), Section 438 – Snatching case – Jump in bail -- Anticipatory bail -- Petitioner had earlier been granted regular bail by the trial Court, but he had absented once as he had noted the wrong date and consequently his bail was cancelled – Petitioner undertakes that the he shall henceforth appear before the Court on each and every date of hearing and would not absent himself except without prior permission of the Court – Petitioner has surrendered before the trial Court and has been released on interim bail -- Order granting interim bail to petitioner is made absolute.

(Para 2-6)

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (61 of 1985), Section 15 – Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), Section 439 -- NDPS case – Regular bail -- Recovery of 21 kgs 500 grams of poppy husk from the petitioner and co-accused -- State contends that petitioner is also involved in several other cases under the NDPS Act -- Challan has been filed but no prosecution witness has been examined – Recovery is of non-commercial quantity, petitioner is in custody for over 05 months, Covid 19 pandemic and the conclusion of the trial is likely to take some time, Court deemed it a fit case to grant the concession of regular bail to the petitioner.

(Para 2-6)

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (61 of 1985), Sections 15, 18, 25, 61, 85 – Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), Section 439 -- NDPS case – Regular bail -- Recovery of 3.5 kgs. Opium -- 06 out of 13 prosecution witnesses have been examined and the petitioner is convicted in a case under Section 302 IPC -- Petitioner is in custody for over two years and five months, he is not involved in any other case under the NDPS Act, the Covid-19 pandemic and the conclusion of the trial is likely to take some time, Court deemed it a fit case to grant the concession of regular bail to the petitioner.

(Para 2-9)

Indian Penal Code, 1860 (45 of 1860), Sections 308, 323, 325, 506 – Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), Section 439 (2) – Attempt to commit culpable homicide – Cancellation of Regular bail --  In respect of the alleged threats by accused, no complaint has been made to the police -- Court does not find any material on record to show that the concession of bail extended to the accused has been misused -- Prayer for cancellation of bail dismissed by Court of Sessions -- Resultantly, no ground is made out for exercise of jurisdiction u/s 439 (2) Cr.P.C. for cancellation of bail.

(Para 2-5)

Indian Penal Code, 1860 (45 of 1860), Sections 420, 406, 506 – Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), Section 439 -- Cheating – Regular bail -- Petitioner joined the investigation and handed over the FDR of Rs.2.50 lacs to the Investigating Officer – I.O. submitted that some amount is yet to be recovered – Held, it is not the job of the Investigating Officer to oppose the prayer for bail on the ground that he is to recover some amount -- Petition allowed and the interim bail granted to the petitioner made absolute.

(Para 2-5)

Indian Penal Code, 1860 (45 of 1860), Sections 420, 465, 467, 468, 471, 120-B – Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), Section 438 – Attesting witness to Will – Anticipatory bail -- Petitioner was an attesting witness to the Will executed by the father of the complainant -- Will is a matter of challenge in the Civil Court -- Neither the ownership nor the possession of the property has changed and no harm is caused in real terms -- Beneficiaries of the Will are in custody -- No allegation that any benefit has been derived by the petitioner who is 55 years of age and is not involved in any other case -- Similarly situated co-accused have been granted anticipatory bail – On interim direction, petitioner joined the Investigaiton – Order granting interim bail to the petitioner made absolute.

(Para 3-6)

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), Section 167(2) -- Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 (37 of 1967), Section 43D(2) – Default bail – Extension of time for challan granted -- Since the Challan was not presented till 05.08.2020, the appellant moved an application on 06.08.2020 u/s 167(2) Cr.P.C. praying for default bail -- Prayer of the prosecuting agency for extension of time to present the Challan was granted vide order dated 07.08.2020, which has, since, attained finality – Appellant was/is not entitled to the relief of default bail.

(Para 14)

Indian Penal Code, 1860 (45 of 1860), Sections 148, 149, 307, 324, 506 (Sections 379-B, 201, 34 IPC added and Sections 148, 149 IPC deleted later on) -- Arms Act, 1959 (54 of 1959), Sections 25, 54, 59 – Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), Section 439 -- Attempt to murder – Regular bail -- Knife blow by petitioner on the stomach of injured who has fully recovered from the injury -- Motorcycle of injured recovered from the co-accused – Petitioner is not involved in any other case – Petitioner is in custody for over a year, the COVID-19 pandemic and the conclusion of the trial is likely to take some time, Court deemed it a fit case to grant the concession of regular bail to the petitioner.

(Para 2-6)

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (61 of 1985), Section 22 (C), 37 -- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), Section 439 -- NDPS case – Regular bail --  Commercial quantity -- Recovery of 600 capsules of Tramadol -- Petitioner was driving the motorcycle while the co-accused was pillion riding -- Polythene bag was in the hands of the co-accused from which total 600 capsules of Tramadol with a total weight of 387.6 grams were recovered – Contention that if the recovery is divided between the accused, it will fall below the commercial quantity – Petitioner is in custody for over 9 months, is not involved in any other case under the NDPS Act, the COVID-19 pandemic and the conclusion of the trial is likely to take some time, Court deemed it a fit case to grant the concession of regular bail to the petitioner.

(Para 2-6)

Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques (Regulation and Prevention of Misuse) Act, 1994 (Act No. 57 of 1994), Sections 4, 5(2), 6(B), 23, 25 – Indian Penal Code, 1860 (45 of 1860), Sections 420, 120-B -- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), Section 439 -- Pre-natal sex determination case – Regular bail -- Without commenting anything on merits, considering the fact that the petitioners are in custody for the last 04 months and 14 days; the petitioners are not involved in any other case; the custodial interrogation of the petitioners is not required and the conclusion of the trial will take some time due to COVID-19 situation, the petition allowed and the petitioners are directed to be released on bail.

(Para 5)

Indian Penal Code, 1860 (45 of 1860), Sections 324, 323, 148, 149 (Sections 325 and 307 IPC added later) – Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), Section 438 – Attempt to murder – Anticipatory bail --  Submitted that petitioner was empty handed and is an old man aged about 60 years and has not caused any injury except that he has provoked the other accused persons – Son of the petitioner has already been arrested – Petition allowed and In the meantime, the petitioner is directed to join investigation within a period of 10 days and he shall be released on interim bail.

(Para 4-8)

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (61 of 1985), Section 15 -- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), Section 439 -- NDPS case -- Interim bail for cremation and last rights of wife – Recovery of 55 kg poppy husk – One more case against the petitioner under Indian Penal Code, 1860 – No danger or disturbance of peace in case the petitioner is released on interim bail -- Petitioner is directed to be released on interim bail for a period of 15 days -- On completion of period of 15 days, the petitioner shall surrender before the concerned authorities.

(Para 2-5)

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (61 of 1985), Section 22, 25 – Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), Section 439 -- NDPS case -- Interim bail – FSL report awaited – Recovery of 750 tablets of Clovidol 100 SR – Petitioner is in custody since his arrest on 30.03.2021 –Report of the FSL being unnecessarily delayed and the petitioner not being involved in any other case, the petitioner is ordered to be released on interim bail till the receipt of the report of the FSL – In case of the report of the FSL being against the petitioner, the petitioner would forthwith surrender before the learned trial Court.

(Para 2-5)

Indian Penal Code, 1860 (45 of 1860), Sections 307, 341, 323, 148, 149, 188, 269 (302 and 325 IPC added later on) – Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), Section 439 -- Murder case – Regular bail – Petitioner was armed with a dang and other was armed with iron rod at the time of incident but no specific injury has been attributed to them -- Fatal blow to victim (deceased) have been given by co-accused – Similarly placed co-accused have since been granted concession of regular bail – Challan filed, charges framed, out of 20 prosecution witnesses cited none of them has been examined -- Conclusion of trial is likely to take considerable time – Petitions allowed.

(Para 10)

Indian Penal Code, 1860 (45 of 1860), Section 377, 506 -- Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (32 of 2012), Section 4, 6 -- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), Section 167(2) – Rape case -- Statutory bail – Addition of offence – Status of bail -- Statutory bail once granted to an accused u/s 167(2) of the Cr.P.C. cannot be cancelled even if his complicity has transpired subsequently during investigation in any offence of a more serious nature, provided that such serious offence is found to have been committed only in the same case, and not any other/different case – Petitioner originally granted statutory bail for the offence u/s 4 of the POCSO Act, 2012 along with Section 377 of the IPC, although subsequently the Final Report was submitted against him for the offences u/s 377 and 506 of the IPC along with Section 6 of the POCSO Act, 2012 -- Petitioner now permitted to be released on same bail terms, subject to an additional conditions.

(Para 3-6)

Indian Penal Code, 1860 (45 of 1860), Sections 323, 427, 379, 148 -- Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 (2 of 2016), Section 12 -- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), Section 438 -- Anticipatory bail to juvenile – Petitioner is aged about 17 years and is a juvenile and he is alleged to be armed with the baseball bat but no injury is attributed to him – On interim bail petitioner appeared before the SHO/Investigating Officer and has joined the investigation and is no more required for any further investigation -- Petition allowed and the interim bail granted to the petitioner, made absolute.

(Para 2-5)

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (61 of 1985), Section 21C – Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), Section 439 -- NDPS case -- Challan without FSL – Interim bail --  Keeping in view the ratio of Inderjeet Singh @ Laddi’s case 2014(3) RCR (Criminal) 953, petitioner ordered to be released on interim bail -- Interim bail will come to an end automatically, the moment report of FSL is received in the trial Court and he would be liable to surrender before learned trial Court forthwith.

(Para 1-5)

Indian Penal Code, 1860 (45 of 1860), Sections 366  -- Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (32 of 2012), Section 4, 6 -- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), Section 389 -- Suspension of sentence –Applicant has undergone 03 years, 05 months and 11 days including remission, out of the maximum substantive sentence of 10 years under 366 of IPC and Section 6 of the POCSO Act, 2012 – Applicant-appellant is not shown to be involved in any other cases as on date – Appeal is of the year 2019, it is not likely to be heard in near future -- Without commenting upon the merits of the case, the sentence suspended during the pendency of this appeal.

(Para 4, 5)

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (61 of 1985), Section 15 – Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), Section 389 -- NDPS case -- Suspension of sentence – Keeping in view the fact that more than half of the sentence has already been undergone by the applicant-appellant and the recovery which has been effected in the other case in which he is said to have been involved was non-commercial, with the appeal not likely to be heard in near future, the application is allowed -- Sentence of applicant-appellant suspended during the pendency of instant appeal.

(Para 4)

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), Section 438 – Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (32 of 2012), Section 8 – Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 (2 of 2016), Section 12 – Anticipatory bail by juvenile – Maintainability of -- Petition u/s 438 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the juvenile is not maintainable.

(Para 9)

Indian Penal Code, 1860 (45 of 1860), Section 420, 120-B -- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), Section 438 -- Non-execution of sale deed – FIR for cheating – Anticipatory bail – Earlier petition was dismissed as withdrawn -- Allegation that accused after having agreed to sell a piece of land, on receipt of Rs.25,00,000/- did not come forward to execute the sale deed -- Accused is also alleged to have sold some portion of the property, agreed to be sold to the first informant, through various sale deeds -- Civil suit filed by the first informant is stated to be pending – Interim bail was granted with a direction to join Investigaiton -- State submits that petitioner has joined the investigation, however investigating officer insists that the amount is required to be recovered, which is not a part of the job of the investigation agency and therefore, the petitioner is not required for further custodial interrogation – Petition allowed.

(Para 2-4)

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (61 of 1985), Section 21, 29, 50 -- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), Section 439 -- NDPS case -- Recovery of 50 grams of heroin – Regular bail -- Charges not framed so far – Complicity of the petitioner on the basis of compliance of Section 50 of NDPS Act would remain debatable -- Alleged recovery is non-commercial in nature -- Petitioner is in custody since 08.12.2020 -- Trial of the case may take some time in its culmination -- Situation arising out due to COVID-19 pandemic and without adverting to the merits of the case, Court deemed it appropriate to enlarge the petitioner on regular bail.

(Para 11)

Indian Penal Code, 1860 (45 of 1860), Sections 147, 149, 323, 302, 506, 188, 216 – Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), Section 439 -- Murder case – Regular bail -- Petitioner is not named in the FIR, no injury is attributed to him, he is in custody for almost 9 months, he is 19 year of age and is not involved in any other case, the COVID-19 pandemic and the conclusion of the trial is likely to take some time, Court deemed it a fit case to grant the concession of regular bail to the petitioner.

(Para 7)

Indian Penal Code, 1860 (45 of 1860), Section 147, 148, 149, 302 (Section 120-B IPC added subsequently) – Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), Section 439 -- Murder case – Regular  bail -- Petitioner is not specifically named in the FIR and came to be nominated subsequently on the basis of a disclosure statement of the co-accused -- Petitioner, is behind bars since the last more than 11 months and is not even stated to be involved in any other case -- Conclusion of trial is likely to consume time as till date only 1 PW out of cited 26 PWs has been examined -- Further detention of the petitioner will not serve any useful purpose as the conclusion of trial will take some time -- Petitioner is ordered to be released on regular bail.

(Para 7)

Indian Penal Code, 1860 (45 of 1860), Sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 471 – Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), Section 439 -- Cheating and forgery case – Regular bail -- No allegation in the FIR to the effect that the petitioner had made any representation regarding sale of face masks or thermometers to the complainant, the role of the petitioner would be debatable -- Since the petitioner has been behind bars since the last about 4 months and is not stated to be involved in any other case, the petition accepted and the petitioner is ordered to be released on regular bail.

(Para 6)

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (61 of 1985), Sections 22(c), 61, 85 -- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), Section 438 -- NDPS case – Recovery of 1500 intoxicant tablets from co-accused – One of the co-accused was granted regular bail -- Petitioner is not involved in any other case under the NDPS Act and the only evidence against the petitioner is the disclosure statement of the co-accused -- In view of the judgment passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in “Tofan Singh's case 2013(4) RCR (Criminal) 631, petition allowed.

(Para 1-7)

Indian Penal Code, 1860 (45 of 1860), Sections 307, 324, 323, 326, 506, 148, 149, 201 – Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), Section 439 -- Attempt to murder –Third petition for regular bail -- Substantial change in the circumstances -- Subsequent to the withdrawal, similarly situated co-accused has been extended the concession of bail by High Court -- Charges have not yet been framed – Both the petitioner and co-accused (since granted the concession of bail) have been attributed the same injury on the thigh of the injured -- Petitioner has been in custody since 30.06.2020 -- Court deemed it a fit case for grant of the concession of regular bail to the petitioner, as the trial is unlikely to conclude in the near future, more so, in the prevailing conditions due to the outbreak of COVID-19.

(Para 2-5)

Electricity Act, 2003 (36 of 2003), Sections 135 – Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), Section 438 -- Theft of electricity – Anticipatory bail -- Interim bail granted on submission that allegations in the FIR are with regard to the theft of electricity causing a loss of Rs.1,30,844/- to Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitaran Nigam Limited -- Civil Court is seized of the matter -- FIR was lodged two years ago -- Petitioner has joined the investigation in pursuance of the interim direction issued by the Court and custodial interrogation is not required – Order granting interim bail to the petitioner is made absolute.

(Para 2-4)

Indian Penal Code, 1860 (45 of 1860), Section 406, 498-A – Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), Section 438 -- Dowry case -- Criminal breach of trust – Anticipatory bail to parents-in-law -- Pursuant to order, passed by High Court, the petitioners have joined the investigation –Contended that certain dowry articles have yet not been returned by the petitioners -- A perusal of the FIR does not reveal that there is any allegation much less whisper against the petitioners of entrustment of any dowry article at the time of the marriage of their son to the complainant – In the circumstances, Court failed to comprehend as to which jewellery/gold ornaments are required to be recovered from the petitioners -- Petition allowed, interim order made absolute.

(Para 1-6)

Indian Penal Code, 1860 (45 of 1860), Section 307 – Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), Section 439 -- Attempt to murder – Regular bail -- Petitioner has been attributed an iron rod blow on the head of injured SK as also a blunt injury on the head of RK – Petitioner was arrested on 28.01.2020 --  Trial is at the initial stage and would take time to conclude particularly keeping in view the current Covid pandemic – Offence u/s 307 IPC has been cited on the ground of intent and not on the basis of any medical opinion -- Petitioner is involved in a number of other FIRs but he has otherwise secured benefit of bail in such matters -- Compromise thrashed out between the parties -- Keeping in view the length of incarceration already suffered, petitioner is held entitled to benefit of bail.

(Para 2-10)

Indian Penal Code, 1860 (45 of 1860), Sections 379/356 IPC (Section 379-A/34 IPC added later on) – Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), Section 439 -- Snatching case – Third petition for regular bail – Petitioner was arrested on 26.01.2020 -- Recovery of the articles has been effected from the petitioner as also co-accused – Investigation in the case is complete and the challan has already been presented -- Charges have till date not been framed -- Trial as such would take time to conclude particularly keeping in view the current Covid pandemic – Petitioner is not involved in any other FIR -- Keeping in view the length of incarceration already suffered, petitioner is held entitled to benefit of bail.

(Para 4-10)