Subsequent purchaser as party-defendant – Suit for specific performance – By amendment plaintiff only seeks to introduce the subsequent events relating to the alienation of the suit property -- Application filed by the petitioner/plaintiff under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC read with Order 1 Rule 10 CPC allowed.

(P&H HC) Decided on: 27.07.2022

Application moved by the plaintiffs for amendment does not relate to pleading of a material fact, rather talks of an admission by defendant -- At the most, the plaintiffs may come up with a plea of estoppel, however, under the circumstances, the amendment of the plaint is not found to be necessary for just decision of the case.

(P&H HC) Decided on: 31.08.2021

Suit challenging gift deed – Defendant executed lease deed – Trial Court dismissed application -- Held, any transaction with respect to the suit property during the pendency of the suit is governed by the principle of lis pendens -- Trial has already made substantial progress -- No ground to exercise its jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is made out.

(P&H HC) Decided on: 12.08.2021

Application dismissed – Observations of – Effect of -- It is well settled that observations made while deciding applications are never binding while finally deciding the suit.

(P&H HC) Decided on: 08.04.2021

Refund of earnest money -- Suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell -- Suit was at the stage of examination of defendant witnesses -- Trial Court allowed plaintiff to amend the plaint – Court do not find any manifest illegality in the order of the trial Court.

(P&H HC) Decided on: 20.02.2020