Cheque bounce case -- Scope of revision is limited to the extent of illegalities or infirmities committed by a court while answering the controversy – Plea of the accused that the cheques were stolen and forged do not merit any consideration for the reason that no evidence was led – There is presumption in favour of complainant and it was for accused to discharge such onus -- Contention that the complainant failed to discharge the onus of showing sufficient amount with him at the time of advancement of loan -- Not a single question has been addressed to the complainant in this regard in cross-examination -- Such issues are matters of evidence and need to be addressed at the earliest – Conviction order upheld.

(P&H HC) Decided on: 20.04.2015