Cheque bounce case -- Revision -- Allegation of forgery against complainant -- Had that been the case, the accused would have certainly filed a criminal complaint in that regard -- No effort has been made to examine any expert either -- Further, there is no denial by the petitioner to the signatures upon the cheque -- Except bald assertion, the accused has not been able to raise a probable defence even while referring to the cross-examination of the complainant and his witnesses – No infirmity in the judgment of conviction passed by the Trial Court affirmed by the ld. Appellate Court – No merit, revision dismissed.

(P&H HC) Decided on: 21.07.2022

Cheque bounce case -- Reduction of sentence -- Cheque amounting Rs.4,58,000/- -- Sentenced to R.I. for one year, fine of Rs.5,000/- and in case default sentence of one month -- Conduct of the petitioner is extremely disturbing, firstly, did not appear at the time the Appeal was pending before the ASJ and was declared a proclaimed offender and was released on interim bail -- Petitioner continued as such for a period of approximately three years -- When the matter came up for hearing before High Court, an assurance was given that he would surrender and file a revision petition, however the petitioner was untraceable -- No mitigating circumstances for reducing his sentence.

(P&H HC) Decided on: 21.07.2022

Suspension of sentence -- Pre-condition to deposit 20% of compensation – Held, pre-condition as imposed by the Additional Sessions judge, cannot be found fault with, being legal and in consonance with the provisions of Section 148 of the N.I. Act, 1881.

(P&H HC) Decided on: 26.04.2022

Suspension of sentence in appeal – Pre-condition to deposit 20% of compensation -- Petitioner was directed to deposit 20% of the compensation amount, as a pre-condition for his suspension of sentence during the pendency of the appeal – Petition seeking quashing/setting aside of the order dismissed.

(P&H HC) Decided on: 07.04.2022

Compromise at revisional stage – Waiver of cost of 15% of cheque amount -- Petitioner has a poor financial condition, 51 year old lady who is stated to be having no source of livelihood -- Court deemed it appropriate that no costs should be imposed upon the petitioner -- Revision allowed and judgments of Lower Courts set aside and the petitioner acquitted.

(P&H HC) Decided on: 04.04.2022

Non-deposit of 20% compensation within 60 days -- Lower Appellate Court directed to take necessary steps to hear the appeal and dispose off the same in the given time.

(P&H HC) Decided on: 15.03.2022

Suspension of sentence with pre-condition of deposit of 20% of cheque amount given as compensation – Court proceeded to modify the impugned order, through a direction to deposit 10% amount of the disputed cheque amount, before the learned trial Court concerned.

(P&H HC) Decided on: 11.02.2022

Suspension of sentence on furnishing of personal and surety bonds in the sum of Rs. 1 Lakh – Later on an application by complainant, Appellate Court proceeded to direct the appellant, to pay an amount of Rs. 2,30,000/- comprising 20% of the compensation amount to the complainant within one month – De hors finality being assignable to P-3/order suspending sentence, High Court directed the convict / petitioner to deposit 15% of the cheque amount before the learned Appellate Court within one month.

(P&H HC) Decided on:11.01.2022

Non-compliance of 20% deposit of compensation – Cancellation of bail -- After a period of about more than 2 ½ years, the petitioner approached High Court for setting aside the impugned orders – Held, conduct of the petitioner itself shows that he is adopting dilatory tactics in order to evade and avoid the payment of compensation -- Petition dismissed.

(P&H HC) Decided on: 22.11.2021

Suspension of sentence – Pre-deposit of 20% of compensation amount – Non-waiver of – Reasoning for – Requirement of -- It is not forth coming from the order that the pleas raised by the petitioner for waiver of pre-deposit were dealt with, it is so, as the Court proceeded on the basis that there is no discretion for waiver -- Impugned orders are set aside.

(P&H HC) Decided on: 01.10.2021

Compounding of offence without consent of complainant -- Cheque amount as well as charges deposited by convict/ accused -- Offence is permitted to be compounded.

(P&H HC) Decided on: 20.12.2019

Cheque bounce case -- Compromise of the matter – Sentence already undergone -- Taking into consideration the argument raised for the petitioners to the effect that he is not seeking acquittal, rather, since petitioner has undergone more than half of his sentence and a compromise has also been entered between the parties, Court feels that the ends of justice would be met, if the substantive sentence awarded is reduced to the period already undergone by him.

(P&H HC) Decided on : 27.09.2017

Cheque bounce case -- Admission of liability in court – Challenge to finding on merit – Held, once the statement was made by the accused petitioner before the lower Appellate Court, acknowledging the due payments towards him, thereafter, he cannot be allowed to breath hot and cold in the same breadth to allege that the judgment of the lower Appellate Court is illegal.

(P&H HC) Decided on: 06.04.2017

Cheque bounce case -- Concurrent running of sentence -- Discretion to make the sentences to run concurrently can be exercised by the trial Court or by the lower Appellate Court or by the revisional Court at the time of exercising revisional jurisdiction -- It will not be open for a person to seek such discretion by moving an application under Sections 427 and 482 Cr.P.C.

(P&H HC) Decided on: 06.04.2017

Cheque bounce case -- Concurrent sentences -- There are numerous complaints of different complainants in respect of different cheques issued from different accounts of different Banks -- Though the complaints were decided by the same Court vide judgment and order of the even date, but the same cannot be treated to be of single transaction -- Involvement in numerous complaints is indicative of the fact the he is habitual offender – Held, petitioner is not entitled to the benefit of running of sentences concurrently in terms of Section 427 Cr.P.C.

(P&H HC) Decided on: 06.04.2017

Cheque bounce case -- Moral Turpitude – Termination of service -- Conviction u/s 138 of N.I. Act even though have a criminal colour cannot be termed to be such as the genesis of the dispute essentially arising from a civil transaction which should not, therefore, ordinarily have any bearing on the service of an employee -- Punishment order of termination of services of the petitioner is extremely harsh – Termination order set aside.

(P&H HC) Decided on: 05.11.2015